­
­
­
­

Inventi Impact: Anaesthesiology

Articles

  • Inventi:haa/32363/20
    Comparison of Intrathecal Morphine with Continuous Patient-Controlled Epidural Anesthesia Versus Intrathecal Morphine Alone for Post-Cesarean Section Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Research 2020 : October - December
    Izumi Sato, Hajime Iwasaki, Sarah Kyuragi Luthe, Takafumi Iida, Hirotsugu Kanda

    Several neuraxial techniques have demonstrated effective post-cesarean section analgesia. According to\nprevious reports, it is likely that patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) without opioids is inferior to intrathecal\nmorphine (IM) alone for post-cesarean section analgesia. However, little is known whether adding PCEA to IM is effective\nor not. The aim of this study was to compare post-cesarean section analgesia between IM with PCEA and IM alone.\nMethods: Fifty patients undergoing elective cesarean section were enrolled in this prospective randomized study.\nPatients were randomized to one of two groups: IM group and IM + PCEA group. All patients received spinal.................

    How to Cite this Article
    Attribution/ CC Compliant Citation: Sato, Izumi, et al. \"Comparison of intrathecal morphine with continuous patient-controlled\nepidural anesthesia versus intrathecal morphine alone for post-cesarean section analgesia: a randomized controlled trial.\" BMC\nAnesthesiology 20 (2020): 1-8.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01050-6\nhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/\nSome formatting elements, header, footer, logos, dates and pagination were modified while adapting this article.
    Download Full Text